Matthew D. Cloutier

A skilled advocate, Matt Cloutier draws on his extensive experience in complex litigation and high-stakes appellate practice to help employers resolve sophisticated legal challenges at both the state and federal levels.

Biography

Matt Cloutier is a litigation associate whose practice focuses on complex civil litigation and appeals. He works with employers and organizations facing high-stakes disputes, bringing a strong background in high-level legal writing, strategic advocacy, and appellate practice developed through both government and private litigation.

Before joining the firm, Matt most recently served as an Assistant Solicitor General for the State of Tennessee, where he handled significant appellate matters in both state and federal courts. He has argued multiple appeals, including before the Tennessee Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and has led the drafting of briefs in the United States Supreme Court, the Tennessee Supreme Court, and other appellate courts. His work has involved a wide range of complex legal issues, including constitutional questions, federal-court jurisdiction, and administrative law – experience he now draws on when advising employers facing novel or high-impact legal issues.

Earlier in his career, Matt spent time in both government and private practice, where he handled matters across all stages of civil litigation, from pleadings and discovery through motion practice and hearings. Matt also served as a law clerk to Justice Sarah K. Campbell on the Tennessee Supreme Court where he worked on cases involving novel and unsettled legal questions and gained insight into judicial decision-making at the highest level – perspective that informs his approach to litigation strategy and risk assessment.

Bar Admissions

  • Massachusetts
  • Tennessee
  • North Carolina
  • United States Supreme Court
  • United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
  • United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
  • United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
  • United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee

Education

Wake Forest University School of Law, J.D., 2017

  • Order of the Barristers
  • Scribes Legal Writing Award
  • National Moot Court Competition: National Champion and Best Brief

Cedarville University, B.A., Psychology, 2013

Experience

Matt’s experience spans both trial and appellate litigation, with a particular focus on complex and high-stakes matters that require careful legal strategy and precise advocacy

As an Assistant Solicitor General in the Tennessee Attorney General’s Office, he drafted briefs in the United States Supreme Court, the Tennessee Supreme Court, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and argued multiple appeals in state appellate courts. He also played a key supervisory role, reviewing and editing briefing and advising on cases involving constitutional and other complex legal issues – skills he now applies when helping employers navigate challenging legal landscapes.

Previously, as an Assistant Attorney General, Matt handled litigation at all stages, including discovery, dispositive motion practice, and trial work. He has examined expert witnesses in federal court and argued appeals in both state and federal appellate courts. His appellate work spans dozens of cases involving a wide range of substantive legal issues.

Matt began his legal career in private practice, where he represented clients in state and federal litigation, drafted pleadings and motions, and advised on case strategy and risk.

Thank you for reaching out to contact Hirsch Roberts Weinstein LLP (“the Firm”). Before you send your message, we wanted to make sure you are aware of the following. Please do not send any confidential information in response to this link. Sending an e-mail to the Firm or any of its attorneys does not give rise to an attorney-client relationship, and will not be deemed to disqualify the Firm from undertaking any engagement for a current or future client. Before any attorney-client engagement may be formed, the Firm will need to check for possible conflicts of interest, you will need to consider whether you wish to retain the Firm as counsel, and we will need to consider whether we wish to accept the potential engagement. In the meantime, the Firm reserves the right to represent parties with interests adverse to you.

Accept Decline