Jerry Weinstein (“Jerry”) is one of Boston’s most experienced lawyers engaged in the practice of labor and employment law. He has represented a wide range of employers, including hospitals and other health care facilities, colleges and universities, investment and financial services firms, broadcast stations, and manufacturing, transportation, warehousing and publishing concerns. Jerry counsels clients on how to respond to union organizing campaigns, represents clients in unfair labor practice proceedings, leads their labor negotiations, handles labor arbitrations, and advises on the interpretation and application of collective bargaining agreements. He also represents clients in all manner of wage and hour, discrimination and wrongful employment claims, and provides discrete advice on individual employment problems. He has negotiated numerous employment and separation agreements on behalf of both employers and executives.

Jerry has appeared before all state and federal labor and employment agencies, including the Massachusetts Commission against Discrimination, the State Labor Relations Commission, the United States Department of Labor, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and the National Labor Relations Board, as well as in the Massachusetts and federal district and appellate courts. When Jerry was with the government he was assigned to argue cases in federal appellate courts throughout the country.

In addition to his private practice, Jerry was on the faculty of the Boston University School of Law for over twenty years; there he taught a seminar in employment law. He is a Board member and officer of Harvard Hillel. Jerry lives in Newton Centre with his wife Joan; their two sons reside in New York City.

Practice Areas


  • Harvard University Law School, J.D., 1966
  • University of Michigan, B.A. Highest Honors, 1963

Recognition and Professional Affiliations

  • Rated AV Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell in Labor and Employment Law
  • Ranked by Chambers USA in Labor and Employment Law (Senior Statesman)
  • Included in Best Lawyers in America in Employment Law – Management, and Labor Law – Management, 1993-present
  • Named a Massachusetts Super Lawyer (top 5% of lawyers), published in Boston Magazine, in Employment & Labor Law, 2004, 2006-present
  • Named a “Best Lawyers Lawyer of the Year 2013” in Employment Law – Management by U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers, 2013

Published Works and Appearances

Jerry has authored numerous articles on employment topics and frequently speaks before organizations and groups. He was invited to give a series of lectures on American labor and employment law to employer associations in Japan, members of which were interested in doing business in the United States. He was a featured speaker at the American Bar Association’s Presidential Showcase Program in San Francisco.

Bar Admissions

  • Massachusetts, 1972

Representative Matters

Bargaining Negotiations: Jerry has led many collective bargaining negotiations on behalf of employers in a number of industries, in particular hospitals, visiting nurse associations, nursing homes, and colleges and universities. These have included first contracts as well as successor contracts, negotiations in single and multiple bargaining units, and simultaneous system-wide negotiations. He has conducted negotiations utilizing innovative interest-based principles of bargaining, as well as “traditional” bargaining techniques. Jerry was part of a small number of lawyers and arbitrators chosen to be included in training films produced by the Harvard Program on Negotiation.

Unfair Labor Practice Cases: Jerry has successfully represented clients in a number of federal courts of appeal throughout the country on issues arising under the National Labor Relations Act. In two instances before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit he persuaded the Court to reverse the National Labor Relations Board in cases where the Board found unfair labor practices when an employer changed terms and conditions of employment, and when it discharged employees who claimed protection under the law as union organizers. He has successfully resolved in his clients’ favor a myriad of unfair labor practice matters before the National Labor Relations Board where, for example, the allegations involved an employer’s refusal to recognize unions, engaging in unlawful election conduct, discharging employees who claimed to engage in concerted activities when they withheld their services, or unilaterally changing terms and conditions of employment without bargaining.

Arbitrations: Jerry has scored victories for clients in dozens of arbitrations involving matters such as the following:

  • Discharge and other discipline cases
  • Pay disputes
  • Right to require overtime
  • Reduction of hours in lieu of layoff
  • Benefit changes
  • Subcontracting
  • Unit work disputes
  • Changes in shifts and schedules
  • Safe staffing

Prior Experience

Jerry was law clerk to the Honorable Clifford O’Sullivan of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit after graduating from law school. He was afterwards employed by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in Washington, D.C., as a litigating and supervisory attorney, before entering private practice in Boston in 1972. After partnerships in several large law firms Jerry wanted to practice in a small firm environment and was one of the founding partners of Sullivan Weinstein & McQuay, the firm that preceded Hirsch Roberts Weinstein LLP. Jerry also has taught a seminar in Employment Law at Boston University School of Law since 1990.


Thank you for reaching out to contact Hirsch Roberts Weinstein LLP (“the Firm”). Before you send your message, we wanted to make sure you are aware of the following. Please do not send any confidential information in response to this link. Sending an e-mail to the Firm or any of its attorneys does not give rise to an attorney-client relationship, and will not be deemed to disqualify the Firm from undertaking any engagement for a current or future client. Before any attorney-client engagement may be formed, the Firm will need to check for possible conflicts of interest, you will need to consider whether you wish to retain the Firm as counsel, and we will need to consider whether we wish to accept the potential engagement. In the meantime, the Firm reserves the right to represent parties with interests adverse to you.

Accept Decline